How to Cite Google Scholar in MLA 9 Format

What “Google Scholar citation format” means in MLA 9

Google Scholar is not a source type by itself. It is a search tool that helps you find sources such as journal articles, books, theses, conference papers, and court cases. In MLA 9, you cite the item you found, not Google Scholar.

Use Google Scholar to locate the best bibliographic details and a stable link, then build an MLA Works Cited entry based on the item’s real format, for example a journal article in a database, a book on a publisher site, or a PDF hosted by a university repository.

A good rule: if you can identify the original publisher and container (journal, book, website, database), cite that. Do not cite the Google Scholar results page.

The core MLA 9 structure you will use

Most MLA 9 entries follow this pattern, with some elements optional:

Author. “Title of Source.” Title of Container, other contributors, version, number, publisher, publication date, location.

In plain terms:
- Author: who wrote it
- Title of source: the specific article, chapter, or page
- Container: where it lives, such as a journal, a book, or a database
- Publication details: volume, issue, publisher, date
- Location: pages, DOI, URL, or permalink

Google Scholar often supplies some of these pieces, but you should confirm them by opening the record and checking the PDF or publisher page.

Author rules you must follow (with your required name formatting)

One author

• Use the author’s full first name, not initials.
• Invert the first author: Last, First Middle.

Example pattern:
- Garcia, Maria Elena.

Two authors

• First author inverted.
• Second author in normal order.
• Use and between names.

Pattern:
- Garcia, Maria Elena, and Daniel Robert Kim.

Three or more authors

• List only the first author, inverted, with full first name.
• Add et al.
• Do not list additional authors before et al.

Pattern:
- Garcia, Maria Elena, et al.

No author

• Start with the title.
• Do not use “Anonymous” or “n.d.”
• Alphabetize by the title, ignoring A, An, The.

Pattern:
- “Title of Article.” or Title of Book.

Why this matters: MLA Works Cited entries are alphabetized. Inverting the first author and using consistent name rules makes your list easy to scan and fair to authors. Using full first names also reduces confusion when multiple researchers share a last name and first initial.

How to use Google Scholar to gather the right MLA details

Step 1: Open the correct version of the source

In Google Scholar you might see multiple copies, such as a publisher page, a PDF, or a repository copy. Prefer:
1. The publisher’s official page, or
2. A stable database record, or
3. A reputable repository PDF if that is the only access you have

Step 2: Identify the real source type

Ask:
- Is it a journal article?
- A chapter in an edited book?
- A book?
- A thesis or dissertation?
- A conference paper?

Your MLA formatting depends on this decision.

Step 3: Capture container and location correctly

For scholarly articles, the most useful “location” is often a DOI. If there is no DOI, use a stable URL, such as the publisher URL, database permalink, or repository handle link.

Step 4: Use Scholar’s “Cite” tool carefully

Google Scholar’s “Cite” button can help, but it often:
- Uses initials instead of full first names
- Capitalizes titles incorrectly
- Misses issue numbers or page ranges
- Provides unstable URLs

You can use it as a starting point, then edit to match MLA 9 and your author name rules.

Examples (with detailed explanations)

Example 1: Journal article found through Google Scholar (two authors, with DOI)

Works Cited entry (MLA 9, with your author rules):
Nguyen, Linh Anh, and Marcus Jonathan Reed. “Urban Heat Islands and Public Health in Coastal Cities.” Journal of Environmental Policy, vol. 18, no. 2, 2021, pp. 155-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1234567890123456.

Why this is formatted this way

• Authors: Two authors, so the first is inverted and the second is normal order, joined by and. Full first names are used, not initials.
• Article title: In quotation marks, because it is a short work within a larger container.
• Journal title: Italicized, because it is the container.
• Volume and issue: Included because journals commonly use them, and they help readers locate the article.
• Year: Included as the publication date.
• Pages: Included as the location within the journal.
• DOI: Used as the location link. A DOI is usually more stable than a regular URL.

Practical tip

If Google Scholar shows only a PDF, open it and verify the journal name, year, volume, issue, and page range from the first page. Scholar metadata can be incomplete.

Common pitfall

Using the Google Scholar URL from the results page. That link often does not work reliably for your reader and it does not represent the real container.

Example 2: Journal article with three or more authors (use et al.)

Works Cited entry (MLA 9, with your author rules):
Patel, Anika Radhika, et al. “Machine Learning Approaches to Early Alzheimer’s Detection.” Neuroscience Methods, vol. 44, no. 1, 2020, pp. 22-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neumeth.2020.01.004.

Why this is formatted this way

• Authors: There are three or more authors, so MLA allows shortening. With your rule, you list only the first author in full, inverted, then add et al.
• Title formatting: Article title in quotation marks, journal title italicized.
• Volume, issue, year, pages: These details show the exact journal placement.
• DOI: Included as a stable location.

Practical tip

If the DOI is not shown in Google Scholar, check the publisher page or the PDF header or footer. Many journals print the DOI near the first page.

Common pitfall

Listing all authors when there are many. MLA 9 supports et al., and your rule requires it for three or more authors. This keeps citations readable and consistent.

Example 3: No author listed (start with the title)

Works Cited entry (MLA 9, with your no-author rule):
“Guidelines for Data Management Plans.” University Research Office, 15 Mar. 2023, https://research.example.edu/data-management-plans.

Why this is formatted this way

• No author: The entry begins with the title in quotation marks because it is a web page or short document within a website.
• Container: The website name is italicized as the container.
• Date: MLA uses day month year when available.
• URL: Included as the location.

Practical tip

If a page lists an organization but no individual author, you may be able to treat the organization as the author if it is clearly presented as the creator. If there truly is no author shown, follow your rule and start with the title.

Common pitfall

Using “Anonymous” or “n.d.” MLA does not require those fillers. If no date is given, you can omit the date and focus on the container and URL.

Why these rules matter (beyond “because MLA says so”)

• Clarity for readers: Full first names help readers distinguish between authors with similar names, especially in academic fields where many researchers share initials.
• Reliable locating: Choosing the correct container and using a DOI or stable URL helps your reader find the exact source you used.
• Consistency in Works Cited: Inverting the first author and applying et al. consistently makes your bibliography easy to navigate and professionally presented.
• Academic fairness: Correct authorship formatting gives proper credit and reduces accidental misattribution.

Practical tips for getting MLA details from Google Scholar

• Click Cite, then choose a format only as a draft. Always proofread and edit.
• Use the publisher page to confirm title capitalization, journal name, and DOI.
• Prefer DOIs for journal articles. If you use a URL, choose a stable one, not a search result link.
• Verify page numbers from the PDF, not only from Scholar metadata.
• Check for multiple versions. Scholar sometimes merges preprints and published versions. Cite the version you actually used, and prefer the final published version when possible.

Common pitfalls to avoid

• Citing “Google Scholar” as the container. It is a search tool, not the publication.
• Keeping author initials from auto-generated citations. Replace initials with full first names to match your rule.
• Using the wrong title formatting, italics for articles or quotation marks for books. Articles and web pages use quotation marks, books and journals use italics.
• Copying unstable links, especially long tracking URLs. Use DOI, permalink, or a clean publisher or repository URL.

If you tell me what type of item you found on Google Scholar, for example a journal article, a book chapter, or a thesis, and you paste the Google Scholar record details, I can format a correct MLA 9 Works Cited entry using your author rules.

Step-by-Step Instructions

Common Errors for Google Scholar Citations

Validation Checklist

Special Cases

What “citing Google Scholar” really means in MLA 9

Google Scholar is usually not the source you are citing. It is an index that helps you find a source. In MLA 9, you normally cite the item you actually read, for example a journal article on a publisher site, a PDF in an institutional repository, or a book in Google Books. You only cite Google Scholar itself when you truly used it as the container for the information you are relying on, such as a case where the only accessible record is the Google Scholar entry and you cannot access the full text anywhere else.

Why this matters: MLA citations are designed to help your reader find the exact version you used. Google Scholar often lists multiple versions. If you cite Scholar when you actually used a publisher PDF, your citation points readers to the wrong place.

Core MLA 9 approach for Google Scholar edge cases

Use the version you actually consulted

Google Scholar may show “All versions” and link to PDFs hosted in different places. In MLA 9 you should cite the version you opened and read. That usually means the publisher platform, a database, or a repository.

Practical tip: Before you build your Works Cited entry, click the link you used and check the PDF header or landing page for the journal title, volume, issue, year, page range, and DOI.

Treat Google Scholar as a “container” only when needed

If the only thing you can access is the Google Scholar record (title, authors, snippet, and metadata) and you cannot retrieve the full text, you may cite the Google Scholar entry as a web page. This is a last resort because Scholar records can be incomplete.

Common pitfall: Students cite “Google Scholar” as the website for every scholarly article. In MLA, the container is usually the journal and the platform where you read it, not the search tool that found it.

Author name special cases (using your required rules)

Full first names, not initials

Your rule requires full first names, not initials. Google Scholar often shows initials only, for example “J. Smith.” If you can confirm the full name from the article PDF, the journal site, Crossref, the author’s university page, or the book title page, use the full first name. If you cannot confirm, do not guess. Use what the source provides.

Why this matters: Your Works Cited list is also an identity record. Full names reduce confusion between authors with similar initials and support accurate attribution.

Two authors

List the first author inverted, then “and” plus the second author in normal order.

Three or more authors

List only the first author (inverted) followed by “et al.” Do not list additional authors before “et al.” under your rules.

No author

Start with the title. Do not use “Anonymous” or “n.d.” Alphabetize by the title, ignoring A, An, and The.

Missing or messy metadata in Google Scholar

Missing page numbers

Some Google Scholar entries omit page ranges, especially for early view articles or repository PDFs. MLA 9 does not require page numbers if they are not available, but include them when you can verify them from the PDF or publisher page.

Tip: If the PDF has no page numbers but uses article numbers (common in some journals), you can include the article number if the journal uses it as the locator, and you can treat it as part of the publication details.

“Cited by” counts and metrics

Do not include “Cited by” counts, h-index style metrics, or Google Scholar ranking information in MLA citations. These are not part of the source’s bibliographic identity.

Multiple dates

Google Scholar may show a year that reflects an online posting, a conference version, or a repository upload. Prefer the publication date of the version you read. If you read a preprint, cite it as a preprint and use the preprint server as the container.

Corporate authors and group authors

Sometimes the “author” is an organization. Use the organization name as the author. If Google Scholar lists a lab name but the PDF lists individual authors, follow the PDF.

Titles and containers: common edge cases

Titles in quotation marks versus italics

In MLA, the title of an article, chapter, or web page goes in quotation marks. The title of a journal, book, website, or database goes in italics. Google Scholar often blurs these distinctions, so confirm the source type.

Abbreviated journal titles

Google Scholar sometimes uses abbreviated journal titles. MLA prefers the full journal title when you can find it on the article PDF or journal site.

DOIs and stable URLs

If a DOI is available, include it. A DOI is usually more stable than a long URL. If there is no DOI, use a stable URL from the site you used. For many library databases, you should use a permalink if provided.

Common pitfall: Copying the Google Scholar redirect URL. Those links can break or vary by user. Use the publisher URL, DOI, or a stable repository link instead.

Examples (with detailed explanations and correct formatting)

Example 1, Google Scholar finds a journal article, you read it on the publisher site

Scenario: You click a Google Scholar result, then read the article on the journal’s website. The Scholar record shows initials, but the PDF shows full names.

Works Cited entry (MLA 9, following your author rules):
Nguyen, Minh Quang, and Sarah Elizabeth Patel. “Urban Heat Islands and Public Health Risk in Coastal Cities.” Journal of Environmental Planning, vol. 42, no. 3, 2021, pp. 155-178. https://doi.org/10.1234/jenp.2021.0423.

Why it is formatted this way:
- The authors use full first names. The first author is inverted, and the second author is not inverted, and uses “and.”
- The article title is in quotation marks because it is part of a larger container.
- The journal title is italicized, and volume, issue, year, and pages identify the exact publication.
- The DOI is included because it is stable and helps readers locate the same version you used.
- Google Scholar is not listed because it was only the discovery tool.

Practical tip: If Google Scholar only shows “M. Q. Nguyen,” do not expand initials unless you confirm the full name from the article itself or a reliable record.

Example 2, three or more authors, Google Scholar links to a repository PDF

Scenario: The publisher page is paywalled, but you access a legal PDF from a university repository through Google Scholar. The PDF lists five authors.

Works Cited entry (MLA 9, following your author rules):
Martinez, Lucia Fernanda, et al. “Machine Learning Models for Predicting Crop Yield Under Drought Conditions.” University of Plains Institutional Repository, 2020, https://repository.uplains.edu/handle/12345/6789. Accessed 1 Jan. 2026.

Why it is formatted this way:
- For three or more authors, only the first author is listed, then “et al.” Your rule says not to list the remaining authors.
- The title is in quotation marks because it is a stand-alone work hosted on a site, but it is not a book or journal issue. It functions like a web-based document.
- The repository is the container because that is where you read the full text.
- An access date is useful for repository content because files can be replaced or moved. MLA treats access dates as optional, but they help in unstable web contexts.

Common pitfall: Citing the journal as the container when you did not actually access the journal version. Cite the version you used.

Example 3, no author, only the Google Scholar record is available (last resort)

Scenario: You can only view the Google Scholar record, and every link is broken or inaccessible. You still need to reference the claim that the work exists and how it is described in Scholar. This is rare, but it is a real edge case.

Works Cited entry (MLA 9, following your no-author rule):
“Community-Based Water Monitoring in Rural Watersheds.” Google Scholar, https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Community-Based+Water+Monitoring+in+Rural+Watersheds. Accessed 1 Jan. 2026.

Why it is formatted this way:
- There is no author, so the entry begins with the title in quotation marks.
- Google Scholar is italicized as the website container because, in this case, the record itself is what you consulted.
- The URL is a query link, which is not ideal, but it documents what you actually used. The access date is important because search results and rankings can change.

Common pitfall: Treating this as equivalent to citing the full article. If you only saw the record, be careful not to quote or paraphrase content you did not read.

Practical tips and common pitfalls checklist

Tips

• Click through Scholar and cite the final landing page or PDF you read.
• Verify full first names from the source itself, not from guesswork.
• Prefer DOI links over long URLs.
• Use an access date for repositories, PDFs, and any page likely to change.
• Double-check whether the item is an article, a book chapter, a thesis, or a preprint, then format the title and container accordingly.

Common pitfalls

• Using Google Scholar as the container for everything.
• Copying abbreviated author names and expanding them without confirmation.
• Using a Google Scholar redirect or session-based link.
• Mixing versions, for example citing a journal version but reading a preprint.
• Missing the difference between the work’s title and the container title.

Why these rules matter

These special-case decisions affect two things: credibility and retrievability. Credibility improves when your citation accurately reflects what you consulted, and when author names are presented clearly and respectfully using full first names. Retrievability improves when you cite stable identifiers like DOIs, correct containers, and the specific version you read. Instructors and readers can verify your evidence quickly, and your Works Cited list becomes a reliable map to your research, not just a record of where you searched.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I cite a Google Scholar result in MLA 9, do I cite Google Scholar or the original article?

In MLA 9, you usually cite the original source, not Google Scholar. Google Scholar is a search tool, like a library catalog, so your Works Cited entry should match the item you actually used, such as a journal article, book chapter, thesis, or conference paper. Use Google Scholar to find complete publication details, then verify them on the publisher page, the journal site, your library record, or the PDF itself. For example, if you click a Scholar result and read the article on JSTOR, cite the article and include JSTOR as the container if you accessed it there. Only cite Google Scholar itself if you are discussing the database as a source, such as analyzing search results or comparing citation counts. For MLA guidance, see https://style.mla.org/works-cited-a-quick-guide/ and https://style.mla.org/citing-databases/.

Can I use the Google Scholar “Cite” button for MLA, and how do I fix it when it looks wrong?

You can use the Google Scholar “Cite” button as a starting point, but you should treat it as a draft. Common issues include incorrect capitalization, missing contributors, wrong journal volume or issue, missing page range, and formatting that does not match MLA 9 punctuation. A practical approach is to paste the MLA suggestion into your document, then compare it against the article PDF or publisher record. Check author names, article title in quotation marks, journal title in italics, volume, issue, year, and page numbers. Add a DOI when available, formatted as a URL, for example https://doi.org/.... If you accessed the article through a database, include that database as the second container and add the URL or DOI as appropriate. MLA’s overview and examples are here: https://style.mla.org/works-cited-a-quick-guide/.

How do I cite a PDF I found through Google Scholar, especially if it is hosted on a university site or ResearchGate?

Cite the work itself, then include the website that hosts the PDF as the container if that is where you accessed it. For a journal article PDF on a university repository, your entry typically includes the article author, title, journal title, volume, issue, year, pages if shown, then the repository name in italics, and the URL. If the PDF is on ResearchGate, treat ResearchGate as the website container, but still identify the original publication details if you can confirm them. If the PDF lacks page numbers, omit them. If you cannot verify journal details, cite it as a web PDF with the available information, but note that incomplete data can weaken credibility. When possible, prefer the publisher or library version. See MLA guidance on containers and web sources: https://style.mla.org/containers/ and https://style.mla.org/citing-websites/.

How do I cite a book or book chapter that I located on Google Scholar but accessed on Google Books or my library?

Use Google Scholar to identify the book or chapter, then cite the version you actually consulted. If you read a chapter in an edited book, cite the chapter, not just the whole book, and include the book as the container. A practical scenario is finding a chapter via Scholar, then opening a limited preview in Google Books. You can cite the chapter and list Google Books as the platform only if that is where you accessed it, and include the URL. If you used a library ebook platform, list that platform instead. For a whole book, include author, title in italics, publisher, year, and then the platform and URL if it is an ebook. MLA book and chapter guidance is here: https://style.mla.org/citing-a-book/ and https://style.mla.org/works-cited-a-quick-guide/.

How do I handle missing information from Google Scholar, like no author, no date, or unclear journal details?

Start by checking beyond Google Scholar. Open the publisher page, the PDF first page, Crossref, or your library record to confirm authorship, date, journal title, volume, issue, and pages. If there is no author, begin the Works Cited entry with the title. If there is no date, use the best available date from the source, or omit the date if none can be verified, but be consistent. If the journal details are unclear, prioritize a DOI, since it reliably identifies the item. For in text citations, use the first element of the Works Cited entry, often a shortened title, plus a page number if available. If you must cite an undated web posting, include an access date if your instructor requires it. See MLA on unknown authors and dates: https://style.mla.org/works-cited-a-quick-guide/.

Do I need to cite Google Scholar if I used it to find sources, and can I cite a Scholar profile or citation count?

If you only used Google Scholar to discover sources, you do not cite it, you cite the sources you read. You would cite Google Scholar only when it is part of your evidence, such as describing search results for a methodology section, comparing how many citations an article has, or analyzing an author’s Google Scholar profile. In that scenario, treat the profile or results page as a web page. Include the page title or profile name, the website name, the publisher if relevant, the date if listed, the URL, and an access date if required by your instructor. A practical example is citing a Scholar profile to support a claim about an author’s h index, but you should also explain limitations, since metrics change over time. See MLA web citation guidance: https://style.mla.org/citing-websites/ and database guidance: https://style.mla.org/citing-databases/.

Last Updated: 2026-01-01
Reading Time: 10 minutes